What
a funky election process this has been so far, huh?
Obviously there’s been all
the relentlessly entertaining (and alarmingly terrifying) hoopla over at the
Grand Ol’. But suggesting that childish, unsubstantiated hysterics, outspoken
bigotry and overt racism are a surprise coming from the Republican Party, would
simply mean you’ve never heard of them before. Yes, it’s always interesting to
hear what those folks are yelling about from time to time, but basically: “Haters
gunna’ hate.” (Once again, #TaylorSwift has already said everything I’m
thinking.)
But
what’s been more subtly fascinating is what we’ve got going on on the Left. The
Democrats have been having their own polite scuffle over who they’d prefer to
watch make funny faces across the stage from Trump in a few months. While
Martin O’Malley is, without a doubt, a very handsome fellow, and seems like a
delightful dinner guest, I’m going to pretend he doesn’t exist, just like
everyone else. That leaves us with Hillary Clinton, a woman whom some of us are
understandably a little tired of, and Bernie Sanders, a cranky old socialist
Jew. While just a few years ago that would have been a perfect recipe for
putting a republican in the White House, there does seem to have been a black
guy sleeping there for a while. What has turned out to be a really fun, and
generally friendly debate to have with other liberals is whether or not you’re “Feeling
the Bern.” I mean, let’s be honest, we all felt it a little at first there,
didn’t we? Who among us doesn’t want to wrestle that guy into a bear-hug while
he squirms and barks curmudgeonly Yiddish clichés in protest? Plus, his
feathers were all ruffled about banks and Wall Street and all that stuff those
folks in tents at Union Square were pissed about a couple years ago. As a
liberal Democrat, how could you not want to jump aboard the Bernie Bus? But
perhaps it’s time to hop off.
In
conversations I’ve had with Sanders supporters I hear a sense of enthusiasm and
starry-eyed wonderment that many have referred to as being reminiscent of Obama
supporters in 2008. While this sort of liberal fervor is certainly admirable
and well-meaning, there is a lot about the political climate this time around,
as well as the players involved, that is very different.
First,
Barack Obama was (and continues to be) a black man. That fact, whether we’d
like to admit it or not, was a tremendous factor in the legendary voter turnout
he inspired in 2008. With good reason too. Considering the undeniable and
unspeakable history of racism in our country, the idea that there was a
likeable, smart, well respected black person in a position to actually become
president, was unbelievably exciting to a lot of us. An entire group of
American citizens, and potential voters, many of whom had never bothered to
vote before because their only choices were white guys who didn’t care about
them, finally had an option that mattered. There are even some white folks that
had never once questioned whether or not #blacklivesmatter more than our
privileged and protected white lives, because ours are not historically,
perpetually and overwhelmingly more likely to be put in jeopardy. But I digress…
Which is actually my point: Is there something about Bernie Sanders that has
that sort of emotional appeal to a significant enough group of previously
unrepresented voters?
Another
reason things are different now than they were in 2008 is the wild success of
ideological and anti-establishment conservatives. The unprecedented amount of
support for Republican presidential candidates like Donald Trump, Ben Carson
and Ted Cruz changes the tone of this election drastically. The fact that so
many conservatives have flocked so far to the right that this sort of candidate
can enjoy the kind of support they have, has alienated a large part of the more
centrist members of the Republican Party. If one of these candidates succeeds
in becoming the Republican nominee, (which is seeming inevitable at this
point,) that leaves a very decent portion of conservatives who would feel so
uncomfortable giving any of them their vote, that they might either not vote at
all, or even deign to cross party lines. So how could Democrats convince swing
voters and this new group of freshly embarrassed, left-leaning conservatives to
step up to bat for a Democrat? By using the kind of angry, galvanizing rhetoric
that is arguably reminiscent of the candidates that turned them away from the
Republicans in the first place? By identifying as socialist? I’ve got a very
strong feeling that that word is the reason a lot of these folks usually
identify as Republican. If a group of centrist republicans gets scared away by
social conservatives, that probably means they’re fiscal conservatives who hate
nothing more than socialism. As far as I can see, this sort of voter would be
utterly turned off by a Sanders nomination.
‘But
Bernie is so great! I support what he stands for.’ Yes, absolutely. His grumpy,
un-wavering disgust with big businesses taking advantage of the majority of us ‘hard-working’
middle and working class Americans is, without a doubt, the right attitude.
Break up the big banks, look out for the little guy, stick it to the man,
basically, that one, admittedly important issue. Yes I agree, it’s a good issue.
And it’s wonderful that he has been bringing it to the forefront of political
discourse. But aside from the fact that it really does seem to be the ONLY
issue he has strong feelings about, what is it that he’s actually suggesting?
Does he actually plan to break down Wall Street, our entire capitalist economic
system and start from the ground up with a completely socialist approach? Maybe
he has a less dramatic approach in mind, but considering his consistent brand
of vehemently grumpy stubbornness, it certainly seems like the sort of thing he’d
be into. But is that something that Americans or the world economy actually
wants? American capitalism, while clearly far from perfect, effects the world’s
economy and many countries rely on it to stimulate their own. And honestly,
does anyone believe something so drastic is going to fly with Congress? Those
incredibly wealthy people who control so much of what happens in politics are
influential for a reason: they’re rich and powerful and they’re not about to
just disappear because we want them to. Hopefully, there are other ways to chip
away at just how much power they have.
But
how is he as a politician? (Which, by the way, is not a negative thing to call
someone, it’s a profession, and it’s the way government happens.) Well,
apparently, it turns out he’s actually kind of a prick as far as negotiating
and leadership. In the article entitled “The trouble with Bernie,”
Mickey Hirten cites a laundry-list of examples that make Bernie Sanders out to
be an incredibly difficult person to work with. My personal favorite (if for no
other reason than it made me giggle,) was a conversation the author had with
Sanders, ending with: “…At which point he jumped out of his seat, told me to
go f***myself and stormed out…” As fun as it sounds to watch our old Jewish
president do something like that to, say, Putin, or even Speaker of the House
Paul Ryan, it’s not a very presidential, or effective way to go about
participating in politics. Plus, it comes across as a bit Trump-y, doesn’t it?
No comments:
Post a Comment